MEMORANDUM
23 October 1996
We have obtained some preliminary results concerning surface resistance measurements
of an LHC beam screen sample at different frequencies and temperatures, down to
K.
Table 1 gives a summary of these measurements in chronologic order, from room temperature
down to cryogenic temperatures and then up to about
K: the second column
of the table gives the frequency in MHz, the third and
fourth columns contain the average temperature and the temperature difference
between top and bottom of the sample, about 1 m long, while the last two columns give the
measured surface resistance
in m
for the inner conductors and for
the outer tube, respectively. The two inner cylindrical conductors
(of radius 8 mm) and the outer tube (of radius 18.6 mm) are all made out of
stainless steel with a 50
m electrodeposited copper layer. However the inner
conductors have been thermally treated at
C and their measured
RRR is around 200, while the outer tube has not been thermally treated and its estimated
RRR is between 30 and 100. We plan to use a thermally treated tube in future measurements.
In Table 2, we show the conductivities extrapolated from the measured surface resistances
in the relevant (classic or anomalous) regime. The ratios between these conductivities
and those measured at room temperature at the same frequencies indicate a significant
reduction w.r.t. the dc RRR values and may be attributed to surface roughness
effects: the measured surface roughness is in the
m range.
These preliminary results do not cover the full frequency range 150 MHz-3 GHz that
we may be able to explore and still require close scrutiny and cross-check.
For example, all the measurements
at 947 MHz correspond to conductivities systematically lower for the outer tube and
higher for the inner conductors: therefore they are not very reliable.
Similarly, the single measurement at 2.8 GHz corresponds to a surface resistance for
the inner conductors smaller then the minimum theoretical low temperature limit
m
.
These discrepancies should be clarified by future measurements with a modified
geometry of the coupling ports.
A detailed description of the measurement technique, including
error estimates and an acknowledgement of the important contributions made
by several people who helped us, will appear in a forthcoming LHC report.
Finally, in Fig. 1, we compare the measured surface resistances at
K with
theoretical predictions based on the measured room temperature conductivities and dc RRR.
In particular, the low temperature conductivity of the outer tube is comparable to that
of the LHC beam screen in a magnetic field of 8.4 T, but the measured surface resistance
is more then twice the classically predicted value. Since ohmic losses scale linearly with
,
if these preliminary results are confirmed at higher frequencies and also in
future measurements with a strong magnetic field,
we may anticipate an increase by a factor two of the LHC heating budget associated
with resistive losses at 7 TeV, presently estimated at 75 mW/m for nominal beam parameters and
at 188 mW/m for ultimate beam parameters.

Figure 1: Surface resistance measured at
K for the inner conductors (a)
and for the outer tube (b), compared to the predictions in the classic (solid) and
anomalous regime (dashed). We have assumed an electrical conductivity of
m
(i.e., RRR
200) for the inner conductors and
of
m
(i.e., RRR
50) for the outer tube.
Note that the measurements at 947 MHz are not very reliable.